About this investigation
Full audit trail of how this report was produced — target identification, analytical techniques applied, tools that ran, gaps recorded, and the schema and skill versions used. Reproducibility is a forensic posture.
Deutsche Bank AG
German multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany, providing corporate and investment banking services globally.
- Domain registered September 1997
- Headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany
- Listed on Frankfurt Stock Exchange and NYSE (ticker: DB)
Investigation Metadata
ProvenanceAnalytical Methodology
Structured analytic techniques · ICD 203Surfaced five assumptions; HIGH-sensitivity HIGH-confidence on GLEIF children currency and DMARC enforcement; MOD-sensitivity MOD-confidence on Hudson Rock corpus currency, which is the only assumption that materially limits a key_judgment.
Three competing hypotheses on security posture: (H1) mature/strong; (H2) mixed; (H3) weak/systemic gaps. Weighted inconsistency favors H2 — strong perimeter (DMARC strict-reject A1, segregated ASNs A1, Proofpoint A2) is consistent with H1 but the 344 stealer-touched employee sessions on dbrasweb.db.com (B2) are inconsistent with H1. H3 is inconsistent with the strict-reject DMARC and EV TLS (A1 records). H2 retained as leading hypothesis.
Imagined failure: the 344 sessions are stale historical exposure already remediated. Refuting evidence would be a Hudson Rock decay-curve showing the corpus is shrinking, or rotation timestamps on dbrasweb session cookies. Recon could not confirm either, so H2 retained but with confidence-limit flagged on kj_002 (held at high because the corpus enumerates active session URLs, not just credentials).
Applied per org-target rule. Six red vectors composed and ranked by impact: dbrasweb credential-stuffing > spear-phish > Salesforce multi-tenant > Markit supply-chain > CSC registrar > numis.com legacy seam. Ten blue controls paired or baseline.
Coverage
Schema v1.0Tools Engaged
210 enabled · 26 fired · 1 gapTool Gaps
1 methodology steps could not runsha256:6f8dbd4d0ff799bf0d4d2f97168ae6e512c1864d392fd21ce586a8c332a2683b